« A company turns the Microsoft-Novell case into an open source business model | Main | Google to users: you're not the boss of me now! »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e550a42259883400e551eb36038834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference GPL for dummies: mixing GPL and PROPRIETARY code:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Alfred M. Szmidt

The term "non-GPL" as you use it is confusing, there are two different topics, namley code the is GPL _compatible_ and code that is not.

Mixing (in the sense of creating a deriviate work) GPL compatible code is always allowed, even if it might not be the GPL.

Mixing code that is not GPL compatible is never allowed unless it is as you note, a system library.

Alfred M. Szmidt // GNU hacker

mtg

ams,

You're right. I've fixed it partially (replaced NON-GPL by PROPRIETARY) for now.

Thanks!

ffxiv gil

I'm also a firm believer that once a cat (well, a license) is out of the bag it's better to trust people and to provide them with as much information as possible so that they can choose by themselves.

The comments to this entry are closed.